COMPARATIVE LIT ESSAY:
Okay, I know what you’re thinking, do pineapples even grow in Texas? While the Lone Star State isn’t known for this tropical fruit, it doesn’t mean it can’t make a mean pineapple cider. I am not sure how they are sourcing their pineapple juice (puree in the case of Bishop and concentrate for Austin Eastciders) but, regardless, both have crafted a super tasty end product. And to be honest, there is not much separating these two drinks, they are two of the most similar tasting ciders I have ever tasted side by side. But here is how they break down:
They are both pretty cloudy in the glass, you even get some unfiltered bits (which = yumminess), but the Bishop is a bit darker. I also like the nose of Bishop better as it smells like a thick, rich and juicy pineapple. The Austin cider has just a hint of pineapple and a slight fermentation or yeasty smell. When it comes to mouthfeel the Bishop is ever so slightly thicker whereas the Austin is a teeny bit lighter and maybe a little smoother. The Bishop has a bit more acidity and you get three phases with pineapple, followed by sharp acidity and then a lovely pineapple reprise. It also has just the right amount of sweetness—not too much or too little. Like the nose, the flavor of Austin has just a little bit of yeast in it and it also feels a bit stronger in alcohol taste.
Even though these drinks are very very similar, I do have a slight preference for the Bishop and would probably grab that one from the fridge if I had an option between the two. It is bolder, a little sharper and has a clearer pineapple flavor without being overpowering. It also lacks the light yeast notes of Austin Eastciders. Bishop’s Apple Pineapple is excellent, give it a try.